GTA3, or least that's what i meant to have.

grand theft auto 3 has never been so violent before. johnny put in a bunch of cheats and now everyone is killing each other and the gore level is higher and you can use any weapon and there's tanks. it's beautiful. unfortunately, i sicken of the mindless destruction of cops quicker than everyone else. and i can no longer complete normal missions due to the obscene number of violent people. this was simply going to be a mundane entry, but i wish to use GTA3 as an example of my thoughts on cops. it's fun to kill them in the game, however no more fun than it is to kill anyone else. cops are siply easier to kill because they run to you, while others run away. other people seem to find it more fun to kill cops. because they're cops. they represent laws and the upholding of the laws. a lot of laws need be there. this is in the real world i'm talking about. we need laws. because people are stupid. the same people that claim cops are useless and that communism would work better than democracy agree with me that people as a whole are very stupid. and the majority of individuals are stupid too. therefore, cops are necessary and communism would NOT work. their conterpoint is that people can be taught to be not stupid. if such was the fact, the government would have taught the people to be not stupid. ah, maybe they are doing that. maybe that's why laws are in place. to tell the people what actions are considered stupid and to persuade people from doing these stupid acts. yes, there are some fallacies. i don't think 90% of the drugs that ARE legal should be legal. problem: they are legal and making them illegal would cause havoc. it's a mistake already made. solution: quit legalizing drugs. in a letter from senator grassley, legal drugs were refered to as "pharmaceuticals" and illegal drugs were refered to as drugs. yes, it is merely a wording, but it represents the warped teaching of the nation. if it is too late to make a drug legal, the government feels the need to justify the original legalization. they can't just say "hey, it's legal. it was a mistake to make it that way. if possible, we'd like to revoke the legalization of it, but do to past experiences with this (ie: prohibition) we realize this would be a difficult process." that even sounds somewhat like official wording near the end. the point of this all is what our parents told us when we were little kids. two wrongs don't make a right. legalizing one harmful drug does not justify the legalization of another harmful drug. rather than excuse the legalization of marijuana with the fact that paxil is much more harmful, more habitforming, and much less heathy, people should be attempting to get paxil delegalized. am im not half-assed about this either. i think one of the first drugs to be delegalized should be alchohal. no drug is more destructive. probably because no drug (other than nicotine) is as common. yes, even though i smoke, i think cigarettes and all other forms of tobacco should be delegalized. they're extremely deadly. don't ask me how to do this. if the solution was easy enough for a 19 year old (freshly 19, i might add) smoker to uncover, i believe that people making careers of this would have succeeded by now. if ever i do find a solution, i may try to get it incorporated. until then, i just feel that people should read my thoughts. maybe you've heard them before. but maybe you've never heard them from a 19 year old (once again, newly 19) that smokes (cigarettes only) and has NO friends that have never at least sampled marijuana. yes, i'm one of a dieing breed. i've NEVER tried it. aye, maybe i should post my views on why i haven't. maybe.